+x onkelmuetze - 8/7/2019 9:58:49 AMThe FIR-boundaries for Germany seem to be incorrect around EDDG. There might be other ares that have been subject to change.The highlighted boundary does not exist anymore, everything north of it now is LANGEN INFORMATION 129.875, as it was south of the boundary. The eastern boundary of this area was extended north up to the next FIR: LANGEN INFORMATION 125.100.Effect: If I plan a route from north of the old boundary, SD will give me the wrong initial FIR Frequency.
+x TouchTheSky - 8/12/2019 1:00:29 PM+x onkelmuetze - 8/7/2019 9:58:49 AMThe FIR-boundaries for Germany seem to be incorrect around EDDG. There might be other ares that have been subject to change.The highlighted boundary does not exist anymore, everything north of it now is LANGEN INFORMATION 129.875, as it was south of the boundary. The eastern boundary of this area was extended north up to the next FIR: LANGEN INFORMATION 125.100.Effect: If I plan a route from north of the old boundary, SD will give me the wrong initial FIR Frequency.I agree, the FIS boundaries need to be changed in SkyDemon according to:New FIS Sectors as of March 2018
+x onkelmuetze - 8/12/2019 1:55:13 PM+x TouchTheSky - 8/12/2019 1:00:29 PM+x onkelmuetze - 8/7/2019 9:58:49 AMThe FIR-boundaries for Germany seem to be incorrect around EDDG. There might be other ares that have been subject to change.The highlighted boundary does not exist anymore, everything north of it now is LANGEN INFORMATION 129.875, as it was south of the boundary. The eastern boundary of this area was extended north up to the next FIR: LANGEN INFORMATION 125.100.Effect: If I plan a route from north of the old boundary, SD will give me the wrong initial FIR Frequency.I agree, the FIS boundaries need to be changed in SkyDemon according to:New FIS Sectors as of March 2018That's not correct, there must have been another change before the publishement of the ICAO chart 2019. The chart you postet shows exactly the boundarys that you see in SD.