Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Feature request: Current elevation


Author
Message
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K, Visits: 8.4K
Both situations described in the posts above could substantially benefit from the Colour High Terrain feature, I feel. Could you try it?
Gax
G
Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 41, Visits: 0
Colour High Terrain doesn’t tell you how high you need to climb to - It just tells you +/- 500’. For crossing a ridge, you need at least 1000’, or 2000’+ if there is significant wind. At altitude, 2000’ can take several minutes to climb due to decreased performance, so you need to be able to plan ahead. To plan ahead you need to know your target number, and that number may change throughout the flight depending on the conditions.

The terrain colouring is nice, but it doesn’t allow you to specify a target height or choose a ridge crossing point. It’s nice for general awareness, but ultimately I’d need to know my specific crossing altitude in numbers.
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)SkyDemon Team (625K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K, Visits: 8.4K
Thank you for clarifying.
Gax
G
Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.1K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 41, Visits: 0
Any time Smile
emporer
e
Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 69, Visits: 5
Hmm, there are 80 likes to Gax posting.
Could it be, that there are more interested in the proposed feature?

T67M
T67M
Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)Too Much Forum (21K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 206, Visits: 3.2K
emporer - 9/14/2018 11:47:14 AM
Hmm, there are 80 likes to Gax posting.
Could it be, that there are more interested in the proposed feature?

Sadly I wouldn't hold your breath - 80 is (apparently) an insignificant number compared to the total user-ship of SD. There are also 78 likes on one thread here about adding limited support for Great Circle navigation (as well as numerous other threads), but that also isn't going to appear even though a beta version was produced which implemented it.

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search