+xYour "before" and "after" screenshots are using different chart styles, that's why the colours are different. We have not changed anything about the colours in the new version.
The airspaces listed in What's Here have been in the order of lowest (most important) to highest (least important) for 15 years, we are certainly not going to change that design any time soon. It's not a graphical representation of space, it's a list of stuff under your finger from most important (or most likely to be interacted with, hence waypoints first) to least important.
The scale of the airspace stack has not changed since we invented it many years ago.
If you are going to give feedback that is not accurate, is a misunderstanding, or on items that have been that way for many years and have nothing to do with the latest version, do not be surprised if your feedback is not acted upon.
Hi Tim,
the illustration has been picked up in a manual to illustrate the evolution.
I'm sorry if it leads in a confusion, I was not willing to say it was from the previous version.
At least it was "once upon a time" and it illustrate that it was more easy to read than the current version, and with items classified through altitude.
I was wrong with the scale, there were only two aera on the graph and only the upper has a slide/compression effect. I believed we can now change each segment, which was a mistake of mine. It works fine with more than two segments, sorry for that.
Now, getting back to the subject, we are not arguing for changing the order of the main segments, but the order within certain segments, i.e. Airspace. (See "Before" illustration)
In the example bellow, the order of 5-6-7 could certainly be 7-6-5.
But yes, in my mind I would classify all sub-item inside "Airspace" family through their height and/or altitude, low > bottom, high > top.
Should a RMZ be in last position ? I my mind yes, because it start's at ground.
At least this refutes the argument that on a phone you see nearly everything at the top of the list, whereas here with the RMZ you have to go all the way to the bottom before seeing it in the current version.
You have had the right order previously (not only the color but also the order inside the segment) and it was easy to read.
And it is a non sense to write "VERTICALE" in this list. (It is boring and totally useless to read that thousands of times🤯)
Would you wrote "AERA NAME" before each sub-item in the next release ? 🫤
Thank you for the discussion Tim,
I'm going to stop arguing and wish you a good day 🫡
Bons Vols !