Andrew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28,
Visits: 87
|
Resurrecting this one again... from South Africa. While we don't require city names, it is normal practice to use aerodrome designators in VFR flightplans... in fact this Aeronautical Information Circular specifically mentions:
1.8.2 SIGNIFICANT POINT (2 TO 11 CHARACTERS) The coded designator (2 to 5 characters) assigned to the point (e.g. JS, JSV, ORNAD, FAWB)
FAWB in the above being an aerodrome It would really be useful - even if to copy and paste into the CAA's online submission site - to have the designator... and less error-prone than having to search the string of co-ordinates to replace the right set with the designator.
As raised before, would be great to have this as a toggle setting to suit various user needs
Cheers Andrew
|
|
|
Daniel Sinn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44,
Visits: 13
|
+xHello! Please do not stop this feature ;-) I had this question a looong time ago here in the forum, but I was told that you will not implement that, so please stick on this topic and make it an option as mentioned above.
I fly from Austria to Germany, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Czech and Slovakia regularly and I file flightplans with city names for every flight and I never had a problem.
So please make this option as mentioned - that is a big feature for us here in central europe. Btw, I also asked an air traffic controller from Austria and he told me, that they hate the skydemon style with its coordinates, but they cannot do anything against ;-)
Cheers, Bernhard. Yes, please don't stop on this topic!! I can share your view to 100 percent, thats so true.
|
|
|
bharb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 26,
Visits: 351
|
Hello! Please do not stop this feature ;-) I had this question a looong time ago here in the forum, but I was told that you will not implement that, so please stick on this topic and make it an option as mentioned above.
I fly from Austria to Germany, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Czech and Slovakia regularly and I file flightplans with city names for every flight and I never had a problem.
So please make this option as mentioned - that is a big feature for us here in central europe. Btw, I also asked an air traffic controller from Austria and he told me, that they hate the skydemon style with its coordinates, but they cannot do anything against ;-)
Cheers, Bernhard.
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 9K
|
I'm afraid when nobody replied to this offer the topic slipped down to the bottom of the list again. It really doesn't seem to be an issue for most people.
|
|
|
Daniel Sinn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44,
Visits: 13
|
+xAs it happens, we are spending some time on flightplan filing ready for the next version and this topic came up. We are discussing adding an option which would preserve town/city names only, in the route field, with an associated warning that the flightplan would no longer be ICAO-compliant.
The Austrian document is interesting. It specifically states that it applies to flightplans filed WITHIN Austria, but most people file flightplans in order to facilitate a journey from one country to another. Are you asking for this option for flights within Austria, or for international flights? Hello Tim,
thanks for your hopeful answer. I am / we are looking for that feature for both flights - within Austria and also in the surrounding countries. I think with your Idea about a warning field about the ICAO compliance that would be feasible.
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 9K
|
As it happens, we are spending some time on flightplan filing ready for the next version and this topic came up. We are discussing adding an option which would preserve town/city names only, in the route field, with an associated warning that the flightplan would no longer be ICAO-compliant.
The Austrian document is interesting. It specifically states that it applies to flightplans filed WITHIN Austria, but most people file flightplans in order to facilitate a journey from one country to another. Are you asking for this option for flights within Austria, or for international flights?
|
|
|
Daniel Sinn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44,
Visits: 13
|
Looks like there will be no further statement on this topic from Skydemon, very disappointing for me.
|
|
|
Tony N
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 335,
Visits: 2.4K
|
+x+xWhy does it prevent you from using SkyDemon, when it allows you to edit the route field?
Because then the user experience is no more satisfying for an automatically filled-in flightplan. +xDianiel,
Out of interest, does the country that you fly in have a National on-line system for submitting flight plans? If so, does it allow for plans to be submitted with city names instead of Lat/Lon co-ordinates?
As far as I know you can only add city names (or similar) in Section 18 and 19. Information in Section 19 doesn't get transmitted with the FPL. Tony Yes, as I fly in Austria, we have homebriefing.com. Yes, they pefer to have the VFR-Flightplan routes to be filled in with written city-names.
My workflow for flights, which require VFR Flightplans is at the moment as follows:
Plan the route in Skydemon for Windows, then open the flightplan window in Skydemon. In parallel I open homebriefing.com in Chrome and create a new flightplan there. I fill in the same data as in the Skydemon flightplan window in all flighplan Sections except for the route. In the route section I type in the planned waypoints as city-names, copied from the Skydemon Pilot-Log.
If I could do that only on my iPad using Skydemon for the whole process, it would be much more efficient and convinient. But as Skydemon does not offer this discussed funktion until today, I have to use the before mentioned workflow, which is very disappointing as Skydemon offers many configurable settings for other functions. Daniel, I am really surprised that works, however seems to be something specific to Austrian flight plans. I found this document which shows what non ICAO compliant reporting points/names can be used in a route:
Over to Tim now!
Tony
|
|
|
Daniel Sinn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44,
Visits: 13
|
+xWhy does it prevent you from using SkyDemon, when it allows you to edit the route field?
Because then the user experience is no more satisfying for an automatically filled-in flightplan. +xDianiel,
Out of interest, does the country that you fly in have a National on-line system for submitting flight plans? If so, does it allow for plans to be submitted with city names instead of Lat/Lon co-ordinates?
As far as I know you can only add city names (or similar) in Section 18 and 19. Information in Section 19 doesn't get transmitted with the FPL. Tony Yes, as I fly in Austria, we have homebriefing.com. Yes, they pefer to have the VFR-Flightplan routes to be filled in with written city-names.
My workflow for flights, which require VFR Flightplans is at the moment as follows:
Plan the route in Skydemon for Windows, then open the flightplan window in Skydemon. In parallel I open homebriefing.com in Chrome and create a new flightplan there. I fill in the same data as in the Skydemon flightplan window in all flighplan Sections except for the route. In the route section I type in the planned waypoints as city-names, copied from the Skydemon Pilot-Log.
If I could do that only on my iPad using Skydemon for the whole process, it would be much more efficient and convinient. But as Skydemon does not offer this discussed funktion until today, I have to use the before mentioned workflow, which is very disappointing as Skydemon offers many configurable settings for other functions.
|
|
|
Tony N
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 335,
Visits: 2.4K
|
Dianiel,
Out of interest, does the country that you fly in have a National on-line system for submitting flight plans? If so, does it allow for plans to be submitted with city names instead of Lat/Lon co-ordinates?
As far as I know you can only add city names (or similar) in Section 18 and 19. Information in Section 19 doesn't get transmitted with the FPL. Tony
|
|
|