LFR 95 Le Luc transit routes

Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

LFR 95 Le Luc transit routes

Author	Message
acassata	acassata posted 11/14/2015 1:06:48 PM Topic Details Share Topic
Group: Forum Members Posts: 33, Visits: 277	Hello SD team, SIA is one more time inconsistent regarding LFR95 Le Luc transit routes: - VRP SA is duplicated in your chart. It is in Visual Approach Chart of Cuers Pierrefeu (LFTF) and of Le Luc Le Cannet (LFMC), but the description is slightly different. In fact, this VRP is not part of these airfields, is part of the transit routes of restricted area of Le Luc (LFR 95). This point is described in in France AIP ENR1.2-25 (page 22). - VRP TV is duplicated in your chart. The reasons are the same as the previous point. The problem is that the position is not the same between the VACs. The coordinates in ENR1.2-25 seem the right ones and are confirmed by the last IGN chart for France Sud-Est. Is it possible for you to report the problem of TV coordinates to SIA ? Can you make anything to avoid duplicates and not associate them to any airfields ? Alexandre Based at LSGL (Lausanne - La Blécherette, in Switzerland)
	Reply Like 41
Tim Dawson	Tim Dawson posted 11/16/2015 11:18:04 AM ANSWER Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 8K, Visits: 9.1K	Unfortunately because they are not in exactly the same position, we do not pick them up as being duplicates of each other. I will forward this enquiry on to SIA but they have not responded to our previous two enquiries. Unfortunately it is common for them not to respond at all. They do not appear to like it when our users (and therefore we) attempt to explain that there is an error in their data.
	Reply Like 58
acassata	acassata posted 11/16/2015 4:30:10 PM Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 33, Visits: 277	The VRP SA is at the same position, only the description is slightly different. Is it possible to avoid the duplication in this case ? Alexandre Based at LSGL (Lausanne - La Blécherette, in Switzerland)
	Reply Like 67
Tim Dawson	Tim Dawson posted 11/17/2015 11:17:11 AM ANSWER Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 8K, Visits: 9.1K	You're right, it is. It's possible we could alter our code to detect this in the future and eliminate one of them (but which?) but in the meantime I would much rather the data was actually corrected by SIA, which I am hoping it will be.
	Reply Like 84