Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

No longer possible to remove Airways in 2.6.0


Author
Message
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.3K
Thank you. We have found the problem that was preventing the airways around ELLX from being hidden as they should have been, since they are entirely within the bounds of other controlled airspace.

EHAM is more difficult. I had a look at it, and all the airways I looked at definitely protrude outside of the blocks of class A airspace. Could you give a few examples of airways shown around EHAM which should be hidden?
milansmid
milansmid
Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 68, Visits: 565
Hello,

Around ELLX it is:

M150

Z110

Q763

which are all embedded in General C airspace (the airways are all C).

Btw. Belgian airspace is the same story and the chart around Amsterdam (EHAM) is, actually, not really usable. Again, these airways are all embedded in airspace of the same class.

Could you please address this issue?

Thank you.

Milan
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.3K
Which airways? What altitude?
milansmid
milansmid
Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)Too Much Forum (7.6K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 68, Visits: 565
Hello,

How did you manage to get rid of the airways? I've got the same problem around Luxembourg (ELLX).

Thank you.

Milan
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.3K
We only show those airways if their lateral limits protrude outside of the other class A controlled airspace, in other words, if there is a need to be aware of them. On more than one occasion it has been discovered that we were showing class A airspace that the CAA/NATS chart was not, which was their error.
waremark
waremark
Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (2.3K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 18, Visits: 50
For the UK, SD charts in VFR mode show airways where the base of the airway is at the same altitude/level as other airspace of the same class, whereas the UK CAA half million VFR charts do not show those airways. An example is airway L10 over Milton Keynes in Bedfordshire where both the airway and the London TMA have a base of 5,500 ft. I would find it more helpful if the SD charts looked more similar to the CAA VFR charts. What is the reason for the different approach?
E-gun
E-gun
Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11, Visits: 114
Problem solved!

Maps updated.

I really appreciate the fast response.

Thank you very much.
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.3K
The official source for airspace data is the Danish AIP, not a chart. I'm going to email you so we can get this resolved once and for all.
E-gun
E-gun
Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.5K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11, Visits: 114
Hi Tim,

Why don't you just remove the airways so your map looks like the official Danish map?

While we are at your map I have earlier pointed out (sent an email) that your map is missing a couple of class C TMA-areas north of Copenhagen.

Here they are framed by thick lines:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17074440/TMA.png

Best regards

Egon Trust
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)SkyDemon Team (678K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.3K
We have re-enabled hiding of airways by grouping them with controlled airspace in the next version.

However I do not believe that will solve this specific problem, which is that many Danish airways poke out of the TMA as defined in the AIP. Unless we are misreading the AIP, that is.
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search