Love the new maps! It presents forrest/mountainous boundaries better in my view.

Runways, I don't think you need worry. Tim and his team are capable of writing quite exceptional software and do listen carefully to feedback. Some of their reticence over new things (which I know irritated one chap at the stand at the LAA rally) I interpret as a strategy under-promising and over-delivering (a rare treat in the IT industry). Skydemon is very good and I believe it will continue to develop without becoming a dog's breakfast. The beta discussion I think is just that.

I happen to have the same view 2high2fastagain. Indeed proudly say also that my subscription expires end 2014 (not 2013). Such is the confidence in Tim & Team and SD, that I do not rely on the CAA charts any more, since I began to use SD seriously 2 years ago. I just hope that improvements could be made without jeopardising the real fundamental requirements. Come to think of it the new map, as seen in the sample on page one of this thread, in my humble opinion is almost a hybrid between VFR & IFR maps. Perhaps this sort of map can also be added as an option keeping the original de-cluttered SD map in.

Very Newbytheway

DurhamTeaseAirport

I know what you mean. I tend to complete my planning in Skydemon and then have a look at my paper charts and draw the lines. I think I'll always carry half mil paper with me, but I only really use them to check on things in flight. For example, I'm never sure which London Information frequency to use - it tells you on the CAA half mil. I suspect this may not be necessary. Early Skydemon sometimes used to put the frequencies out of order as I recall, but I think it lines them up now.