Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Internet traffic info


Author
Message
rv8ch
rv8ch
Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)Too Much Forum (394 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 37, Visits: 62
Not sure if this is in there, or if it's already been discussed, but is there any interest in overlaying internet traffic info onto the SD map?  Perhaps getting a feed from adsbexchange or pilotaware or another provider?   Thanks!
Replies
BJS
B
Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)Too Much Forum (467 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 47, Visits: 149
I am not a friend of exposing PIC to heavy traffic surveillance data instead of the anti collision needed for safe piloting. Most of the data from SafeSky is absolutely irrelevant for executing the flight and I don‘t see the GDPDR issue solved.
Edited 3/30/2022 10:18:16 AM by BJS
177
1
Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)Too Much Forum (879 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 72, Visits: 757
BJS - 3/30/2022 9:48:19 AM
I am not a friend of exposing PIC to heavy traffic surveillance data instead of the anti collision needed for safe piloting. Most of the data from SafeSky is absolutely irrelevant for executing the flight and I don‘t see the GDPDR issue solved.

My personal observations show that SafeSky doesn't display all the traffic from FlightRadar24 (around 20% at a particular timeframe and area) compared to https://live.safesky.app with two monitors working side-by-side. I also didn't find any changes in aircraft position, as they claim to use some faster data protocol with no delays. Just exactly the same picture, but with less traffic. 

I also would love to see internet traffic without 3rd party software. 4G has very good coverage and is working well up to 2-3 km altitudes. Just place a warning that data may be inaccurate, and it's up to an end-user if they wish to take advantage of it.


GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
rv8ch - 3/21/2022 1:04:10 PM
erchegyia - 3/21/2022 10:34:23 PM
BJS - 3/22/2022 11:57:48 AM
rv8ch - 3/24/2022 12:04:16 PM
Tim Dawson - 3/25/2022 11:26:57 AM
rv8ch - 4/1/2022 11:08:38 AM
Daniel_KDF - 3/29/2022 6:15:35 PM
TouchTheSky - 3/30/2022 6:24:18 AM
BJS - 3/30/2022 9:48:19 AM
177 - 4/3/2022 6:29:29 AM
ArnaudC - 4/13/2022 11:52:00 AM
rv8ch - 4/22/2022 9:26:37 AM
                 open your FlightRadar24 app?
erchegyia - 4/22/2022 11:09:41 AM
                     Good suggestion!
rv8ch - 4/22/2022 6:53:13 PM

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search