Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

ED-R Mülheim-Kärlich


Author
Message
FlorianK
F
Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)Too Much Forum (438 reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9, Visits: 18
Hi,

I just noticed that the temporary ED-R Mülheim Kärlich isn‘t shown in SD anymore... I had planned a flight to EDRK Koblenz last week and had the ED-R shown in the map. But I had to cancel the flight due to weather and when planning the flight for this week, the ED-R isn’t shown anymore. One reason might be that the relevant NOTAM doesn’t seem to be published anymore (it also vanished from the DFS page) but according to the NfL 1-1061-17 the ED-R shall persist until 30.12.2018.

Regards
Florian
Reply
Gerhard66
G
Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.3K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 172, Visits: 358
Let me try to resume the facts:

1. there is relevant and important information published solely in the SUP section of AIP.
(Examples: Salzburg and Mülheim)

2. SD does not care about this information. In other words, SD does not integrate this information in its charts.

3. Instead, SD requires it's customers to read the AIP SUP and keep the airspace information in mind or in complicated cases on a paper printout.
So, what's the advantage of SD compared to paper charts and VOR navigation a decade ago?

4. Customers pay SD for it's so-called "German VFR AIP", but they get only a part of it!
The VFR SUP section is missing.

Regards
Gerhard




GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
FlorianK - 10/4/2017 8:46:08 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/5/2017 9:45:31 AM
Chris_LSZO - 10/8/2017 4:08:59 PM
FlorianK - 10/5/2017 6:23:02 PM
JanR - 10/9/2017 5:07:34 AM
Gerhard66 - 10/9/2017 8:33:34 AM
Tim Dawson - 10/9/2017 11:01:15 AM
Chris_LSZO - 10/9/2017 11:22:29 AM
tschnell - 10/9/2017 5:38:30 PM
JanR - 10/9/2017 7:57:26 PM
Chris_LSZO - 10/9/2017 8:07:10 PM
Gerhard66 - 10/9/2017 8:00:03 PM
                 +1. I has try it in different ways. Chris‌‌
Chris_LSZO - 10/9/2017 8:13:36 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/10/2017 10:22:10 AM
Chris_LSZO - 10/10/2017 7:54:15 PM
FlorianK - 10/10/2017 9:03:14 PM
Gerhard66 - 10/11/2017 6:48:51 AM
Tim Dawson - 10/11/2017 2:46:18 PM
             Easy-VFR has solve the problem now:
Chris_LSZO - 10/11/2017 6:18:30 PM
Tim Dawson - 10/12/2017 10:26:21 AM
Tim Dawson - 10/12/2017 1:54:20 PM
ckurz7000 - 10/12/2017 4:14:43 PM
matthiasr - 2/11/2018 8:32:14 PM
Tim Dawson - 2/12/2018 11:33:16 AM

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search