+x

Tim Dawson - 8/10/2017 2:20:50 PM

We can only include aeronautical information if we have assurances of the quality that OpenStreetMap simply cannot provide.

Tim, I can see that you're a decent programmer (or have some) by the product you've created, but I'm not too sure about your business acumen. The way you treat people in the very forums you've designed to funnel their ideas (valuable IP) into your product, is notorious.

I appreciate the brevity of your answers, but I can't understand the reasoning behind such curt replies to well-intended suggestions and comments.
Your replies don't encourage continued dialog, or communal discussion. 

Despite your quick gun-down of this suggestion, I'll still present my idea, just so you know that my response isn't predicated on being rejected. 
‌
‌The idea wasn't to 1:1 OSM's data. It was to use their vectors, in addition to a QA/QC process to ensure that their data *is* high quality, and ratifying it, where necessary.

Being a mapping professional mysefl, this idea comes from years of dealing with projection, scale, accuracy, fidelity and repeatability issues.

‌So, in the end, the hint I receive is to stop posting valuable considerations.
No need for response to this comment, as it is my last on your forums.

Thanks for the great product, no complaints about the work you've done.