Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Wind representation


Author
Message
acassata
acassata
Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (4.9K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 33, Visits: 277
I found discrepancies between wind numeric value and its representation
http://forums.skydemon.aero/uploads/images/5f17108e-846b-4d3d-9818-688a.pnghttp://forums.skydemon.aero/uploads/images/17d51c12-399c-45fd-a856-ccd0.png

The wind vector shows 5 kt less than the numeric value when the speed is divisible by 5 kt.
If it is due to unit conversion and rounded value, e.g. 64 km/h = ~34.56 kt, rounded value = 35 kt, I suggest to round the vector to the closest value instead of rounding down, in the example vector of 35 kt instead of 30 kt.

Moreover, it is possible to show the wind vector for 5 kt with the short line at the second position like the third picture


source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/Wind_barbs.gif

Alexandre
Based at LSGL (Lausanne - La Blécherette, in Switzerland)

Reply
lhe
lhe
Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)Too Much Forum (16K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 154, Visits: 445
Tim Dawson (3/10/2016)
why is it better to show 34.6 with three 10 knot barbs than with three 10 knot barbs + one 5 knot barb?


Because the wind value being shown is less than 35 knots.
Is there an operational reason why it would be more relevant for the pilot to have the wind speed rounded down to the next lowest multiple of 5 instead of rounded to the closest multiple of 5?

Usually, you would prefer the "nearest" rounding as it would minimise roundoff errors in calculations. The only real exception is when it is important to always round in a "safe" direction, e.g. when checking operating minima.
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
acassata - 2/23/2016 4:05:17 PM
Tim Dawson - 2/24/2016 12:50:58 PM
lhe - 3/8/2016 6:39:23 PM
acassata - 3/10/2016 3:56:16 PM
Sky Painter - 3/10/2016 5:00:59 PM
Tim Dawson - 3/10/2016 5:03:42 PM
ckurz7000 - 3/11/2016 8:46:20 AM
                         [quote][b]ckurz7000 (3/11/2016)[/b][hr]I guess the barbs represent the...
lhe - 3/11/2016 9:05:21 AM
lhe - 3/11/2016 9:04:23 AM
Tim Dawson - 3/11/2016 10:58:43 AM
ckurz7000 - 3/12/2016 4:55:21 PM

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search