Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

SD 2.4.3 beta


Author
Message
Runways
Runways
Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 309, Visits: 1.6K
That is alright so long as terrain colours are intuitive. That is unless I am on a totally different track!

Very Newbytheway

DurhamTeaseAirport
Edited 10/6/2012 12:07:16 PM by Runways
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K, Visits: 8.5K
I don't think we've changed the way the chosen runway is depicted at all.
Runways
Runways
Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 309, Visits: 1.6K
Hello Steve, I am sure that that would be very good news for a lot of pilots. Thanks for that.

Very Newbytheway

DurhamTeaseAirport
Edited 10/4/2012 7:06:22 PM by Runways
stevelup
stevelup
Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)Too Much Forum (71K reputation)
Group: Moderators
Posts: 593, Visits: 4.9K
Also prefer trees showing. Can't see why they cannot be included in the experimental version - is it because the terrain is now green?


You are free to continue using the old chart style - it has not been removed.
nje
nje
Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)Too Much Forum (44K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 384, Visits: 4.2K
I went flying today using the beta version and can report that it performed without fault.

I would like to know though if the depiction of the chosen runway when approaching the destination airfield has changed? It is probably me, but it didn't seem to stand out very well, it seemed quite faint. Apart from that, all is well. Keep up the good work
Robby
Robby
Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.8K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16, Visits: 261
HI Tim

I don't think the original charts are cluttered and prefer them to the new version; reason = original charts with terrain as shades of brown rather than green. Also prefer trees showing. Can't see why they cannot be included in the experimental version - is it because the terrain is now green?

I do like the way the airfields are now shown in 2.4.3. - excellent

Robby
steinardo
steinardo
Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (6.1K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 43, Visits: 254
Tim, regarding the waypoints, I dont know how prograaming works, but the way routes work is good. If I should ask for even more refinement, a sync function like Dropbox would be on the top of the list. Meaning, if you update on one device it will automatically update on the others, leaving the clouding transparent. Dont know what practical issues this might introduce though.

Nevertheless, not worrying about white horses, good work :-)
Runways
Runways
Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)Too Much Forum (37K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 309, Visits: 1.6K

That is very reasonable and perfectly understandable Tim.

Having said that, may I request your opinion about the following points:

1. Could this additional layering, colouring and foliage rendering be optional for users to choose in the knowledge that their map rendering may consequently become slower?

2. Alternatively could the older as well as the newer SD maps be available for users to choose from say as SD Map1 and SD Map2...?

3. IFR maps are uncluttered with arrows and way points do not need much colouring except for black,white and (dare I say...) a Few SHADES OF GREY... ! It may be that their inclusion could prove desirable and even topical at this moment in time. Could they be considered to be incorporated into this VFR package?


4. I personally have not noticed appreciably slow map refreshing or rendering. (added 2nd Oct. 2012)



Very Newbytheway

DurhamTeaseAirport
Edited 10/2/2012 7:59:47 PM by Runways
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)SkyDemon Team (636K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K, Visits: 8.5K
Let me reiterate that the other SkyDemon chart style is not going anywhere. We like the white to gray to green to brown colouring for terrain as it more helpfully distinguishes between different types of terrain without taking as much visual contrast as the deep browns used in the original chart, which was based on the CAA chart and is very unsuitable for more mountainous terrain.

We're not showing tree areas in the new chart style because:
  • They're not available for many countries anyway
  • They slow down the drawing of the map
  • When we tried showing them, we couldn't find a shade of green which stood out enough against the new green terrain colouring, which we believe is much more valuable
Yes we promote SkyDemon as a VFR product but that doesn't mean we need to show everything that's on the ground. This is a GPS, remember, and we have no intention of showing white horses, quarries, minor roads and other things like that. VFR are flight rules, not an automatic suggestion that you should be navigating from one oddly-shaped piece of woodland to the next.

As always we'll bow to the overwhelming feedback coming back, but we do intend to launch 2.4.3 configured in this way.
Edited 10/1/2012 12:01:34 PM by Tim Dawson
2high2fastagain
2high2fastagain
Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (5.9K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 43, Visits: 98
I know what you mean. I tend to complete my planning in Skydemon and then have a look at my paper charts and draw the lines. I think I'll always carry half mil paper with me, but I only really use them to check on things in flight. For example, I'm never sure which London Information frequency to use - it tells you on the CAA half mil. I suspect this may not be necessary. Early Skydemon sometimes used to put the frequencies out of order as I recall, but I think it lines them up now.
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search