|
screen
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20,
Visits: 72
|
+x+x+x[quote]What was the price of an annual subscription to MFD, including all the VFR info and plates, compared with SD and the German VFR add-on? All of Europe cost € 297 .-- including 3 days weather forecast, GAFOR and wind etc.
If the altitude data you need is shown on the airfield plates and area charts that come in the DFS VFR add-in, then you've just saved over a €100 per year. You can get weather from lots of places these days.
Thank you for the bill :-)But I fly not only in Germany, but also in Italy, Switzerland, Austria and sometimes in the Czech Republic. now calculate what all this costs?At the same time, as accurately and understandably as the weather or the wind was shown in all altitudes (that for 3 days in advance), I only know from jeppesen mfd VFR
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K,
Visits: 8.4K
|
screen, I asked you what made you think the reporting points had a specified level associated with them. Thank you for confirming your expectation was set by another product. That data is incorrect; the reporting points do not have specific levels associated with them.
There is a general note associated with EDNY on the DFS approach chart that approaches/departures are to be conducted at 3000' max. That isn't the same as reporting points having a specific level associated with them.
As others have pointed out, the product you mentioned was a lot more expensive than SkyDemon. All the information you need is in SkyDemon with the DFS VFR AIP. Unlike all other countries, this AIP is a paid add-on because Germany will not release it for free.
|
|
|
|
|
screen
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20,
Visits: 72
|
this is a current screenshot of foreflight, are they wrong in this case? 
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K,
Visits: 8.4K
|
Yes - they use exactly the same data as the Jeppesen product.
I will again ask you to refer to the official source of this, which is the DFS VFR AIP. Somebody helpfully posted a screenshot of it on page 1.
|
|
|
|
|
screen
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20,
Visits: 72
|
+xYes - they use exactly the same data as the Jeppesen product.
I will again ask you to refer to the official source of this, which is the DFS VFR AIP. Somebody helpfully posted a screenshot of it on page 1. After consultation with the EDNY air traffic control center, they informed by email that this was a requirement of air traffic control. The heights can be found on the AIP VFR map (Appendix). The prescribed heights would be found above the word BODENSEE on the map.
Original Text in Deutsch:
|
|
|
|
|
lhe
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 144,
Visits: 445
|
It is clear from the German VFR AIP that there is maximum altitude of 3000' for VFR APCH/DEP. Whether this information is associated with the routes or the VRPs seems like a minor point. The important thing is that the information is given somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K,
Visits: 8.4K
|
screen - yes, again you were told this on page 1 of this thread.
There is occasionally textual information about approaches, departures or other conditions in the VFR AIP approach plates.
We understand you would like us to duplicate all possible information found on that official source into our own data. I do not believe any product does that, but we will bear in mind your request for levels for approach and departure lanes in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
screen
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20,
Visits: 72
|
+xscreen - yes, again you were told this on page 1 of this thread.
There is occasionally textual information about approaches, departures or other conditions in the VFR AIP approach plates.
We understand you would like us to duplicate all possible information found on that official source into our own data. I do not believe any product does that, but we will bear in mind your request for levels for approach and departure lanes in the future. Thanks for the answer, Jeppesen MFD VFR had entered all information directly into the card. A lot of former users of MFD miss this detail in the other programs offered (SD, foreflight, Garmin, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.8K,
Visits: 8.4K
|
Out of interest, what is your opposition to using the VFR AIP which is the source of that information? It is well integrated into SkyDemon. Someone else pointed out that the combined cost of SkyDemon and the VFR AIP is less than the Jeppesen product used to cost.
|
|
|
|
|
pilot-byom
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 323,
Visits: 388
|
+xOut of interest, what is your opposition to using the VFR AIP which is the source of that information? It is well integrated into SkyDemon. Someone else pointed out that the combined cost of SkyDemon and the VFR AIP is less than the Jeppesen product used to cost. Dear Tim Dawson, it is a widespread misbelief that looking at a Skydemon graphical map representation of "the world, the airspaces and everything" is sufficient as replacement for a proper flight preparation. We don't have to start an academic discussion on the stupidity of such misconception. I agree Skydemon has come to a real nice maturity as navigational aid including the VFR AIP, but everybody has to repeat over and over agin - it is only a 80 to 90 percent aid, no replacement. Best Markus
|
|
|
|