De-duplication of frequencies

Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

De-duplication of frequencies

Author	Message
ArnaudC	A ArnaudC posted 1/30/2019 11:17:54 AM Post Details Share Post
A Group: Forum Members Posts: 78, Visits: 137	+x Tim Dawson - 12/10/2018 11:22:53 AM I agree it looks silly, but it's also rather contrived. It presumably doesn't happen unless there are a bunch of controlled airspace sectors ahead all within ten minutes' flying time, all with the same controlling authority. We could certainly add a system where we record each one and suppress ones where all parameters match one that has already been displayed, but is it worth it? Some follow-up ideas: 1. Many frequencies are linked to a certain airspace. -> Could it be based on declutter settings? If I'm not showing anything above FL75 anyway because I'm bumbling about at 2000ft watching houses or whatever, I don't need to see the frequencies linked to those airspaces either. 2. Extreme example: you fly north of LFPG, in the TMA there are 9 "De Gaulle Approach" frequencies. -> show only one line that becomes like a button, then if press that button it expends to show all frequencies, I can select one (typically when I get a handover) and then the button collapses again and shows only that one frequency I have selected? Edited 1/30/2019 11:21:19 AM by ArnaudC
	Reply Like 3
grahamb	grahamb posted 12/10/2018 4:28:35 PM Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 577, Visits: 27K	+x Tim Dawson - 12/10/2018 11:22:53 AM I agree it looks silly, but it's also rather contrived. It presumably doesn't happen unless there are a bunch of controlled airspace sectors ahead all within ten minutes' flying time, all with the same controlling authority. We could certainly add a system where we record each one and suppress ones where all parameters match one that has already been displayed, but is it worth it? As I said, it's only a minor thing - but if you were doing something to the Radio tab at some point in the future it might be worth a look if to do so was simple.
	Reply Like 4
Tim Dawson	Tim Dawson posted 12/10/2018 11:22:53 AM Post Details Share Post
Group: Forum Members Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.2K	I agree it looks silly, but it's also rather contrived. It presumably doesn't happen unless there are a bunch of controlled airspace sectors ahead all within ten minutes' flying time, all with the same controlling authority. We could certainly add a system where we record each one and suppress ones where all parameters match one that has already been displayed, but is it worth it?
	Reply Like 4
grahamb	grahamb posted 12/8/2018 5:20:58 PM Topic Details Share Topic
Group: Forum Members Posts: 577, Visits: 27K	A minor thing really, but a rejig on the way frequencies are assembled for display on the Radio tab might reduce the apparent daftness of this: I get why it is doing it, but it does seem a bit silly to display the same frequency four times (plus twice more for the LARS/Airport occurrences). It can be helpful to see frequencies down one's track beyond the immediate one if they differ, but if they don't change, why display them?
	Reply Like 3