I am only a customer of Skydemon, but I do no longer use it for night flying VFR in Germany. My feeling - it is far too dangerous to hit something bad or overlook a NOTAM by the method SD uses. I switched to an IFR solution for night flying.
German EDR150 is a not well thought local speciality with very bad implementation at authorities level from the beginning. I am not sure it is worth the effort to built a special solution as Skydemon focus is more European general. How far into the local peculiarities are they supposed to go, even trying to cure bad implementations as EDR150? Yes, one could try to extract the definition of the spider web from the written, artificially build the airspaces from legs and try to parse the NOTAMs, but it is major effort for only a very little group of people. The rest would have to cross finance the labor, are they willing to do so?
I would rather see put pressure on the relevant authorities to "repair EDR150". They could electronically divide the EDR150 into theirs legs and activate them according to real use, instead of simply throwing these stupid EDR150 list NOTAMs. No, I am currently not supporting the request to implement EDR150 into Skydemon - major reason, the programming crew seems to be not behind the idea, which will result in a bad implementation. I choose to have a clear "no support" instead of an unknown buggy one.