Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

Total Trip Planning


Author
Message
G-OIBM
G-OIBM
Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)Too Much Forum (9.9K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 71, Visits: 946
Prior to using the much superior Sky Angel, then subscribing to Sky Demon, I used Jepp FlightStar for my VFR planning (I admit it !).

One of the features I found really useful in FlightStar was the ability to select a waypoint airfield to land and re-fuel (or clear customes etc whilst enroute to South of France). This allowed a trip kit to be printed with all legs included in the PLOG, and to automatically dowload the approach and landing plates etc for the intermediate stops. The PLOG also calculated the diffeences in the total leg times to include the landing and take off info.

In SkyDemon currently, if I want to fly to my ususal field in the south of France, I can't capture this landing en-route data on the PLOG or virtual radar etc.

Is this functionality already included in SD and I can't find it (if so please help look in the correct direction), if not can it be added as part of the planning procedures, perhaps as a right click on an en-route airfiled with an option to land and refuel? This is then reflected in the PLOG and virtual radar, and the plates downloaded automatically if available?

Great stuff and keep up the excellent work.

Ta

Hugh

Regards



Hugh

G-OIBM

Commander 114
Replies
Tim Dawson
Tim Dawson
SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)SkyDemon Team (676K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.1K, Visits: 9.2K
As each sector is its own flight in its own right, they all have their own flight details window entries and so all have their own takeoff time field already.
srayne
srayne
Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)Too Much Forum (49K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 388, Visits: 8.3K
Tim Dawson (7/23/2014)
As each sector is its own flight in its own right, they all have their own flight details window entries and so all have their own takeoff time field already.


What will happen to the times if you plan a flight from A->B then insert a POL in the middle? Presumably the 1st sector can keep its initial takeoff time, but what about the 2nd sector if you don't have a 'time on the ground' field. You could just default to 'time on the ground' of zero so that ETA at the final destination will remain the same but this would be very inconvenient as you will then have to manually update all the subsequent sectors and repeat this every time you insert a POL into an existing sector. 
Edited 7/23/2014 10:49:05 AM by srayne
mjk
mjk
Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.2K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12, Visits: 213
Tim Dawson (7/23/2014)
As each sector is its own flight in its own right, they all have their own flight details window entries and so all have their own takeoff time field already.


Tim,
this new feature is highly appreciated ...

As I see based on your posted Beta, witch is running great on the Mac using Crossover, it works perfectly on the iPad as well.
One key question I got in mind: right now to enter different leg properties you select the leg and enter all data in the usual "Flight Details" Dab.

Unfortunately the colors are not changing regarding the leg you are selecting. It would be much easier to validate with leg you are editing, when the color of the legs between the start - land here - end would have different colors. Like a "active" vs inactive" state.

As a request I would prefer that all legs are edited in one single "Flight Details" window, witch would be simply extended each time a leg is created .. a color code also here would be appreciated as well.

I understand and support your philosophy of leaving much in the responsibility of the pilot vs automating through SD (e.g. Fuel calculation over several legs.
To make it easier for the pilot/user I would find it supportive to just have this one "Flight details" tab with several legs underneath, as this would make the manual entering of data much easier .. 
for example - pilot enters first start time and fuel as full; as SD estimates arrival time / duration as well as fuel consumption the pilot can simply enter now the respective data in the following leg as a starting point .. ideally SD would pre populate in light grey the minimum date as an estimate from the leg before to make it even more convenient for the pilot to actively enter the data / confirm that data, or in red as the fuel would not last for the second leg as a warning ...

I know some of this may definitely something for above and beyond your current scope, but in general this new feature is a massive plus for SD.

Keep up the great work and enhancements
Markus
GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
G-OIBM - 11/27/2012 6:37:54 PM
Tim Dawson - 11/28/2012 5:21:12 PM
EddieHeli - 11/28/2012 8:08:57 PM
Lennart Sundgren - 11/28/2012 8:59:41 PM
Bouwair - 11/28/2012 11:59:55 PM
Runways - 11/29/2012 3:05:59 PM
EddieHeli - 11/29/2012 3:15:14 PM
Doober2004 - 11/29/2012 7:26:45 PM
G-OIBM - 11/30/2012 6:24:03 PM
Tim Dawson - 12/17/2012 1:31:04 PM
Bouwair - 5/3/2013 11:19:26 PM
                 Hello Tim any news on this topic? grts Freerk Bouwer
Bouwair - 5/27/2013 12:56:21 AM
Steve Turnbull - 6/21/2013 10:01:37 AM
             Also interested by this feature...
mbenoit - 6/29/2013 2:52:09 PM
rosdol - 8/24/2013 12:06:19 PM
ckurz7000 - 8/24/2013 4:45:52 PM
DavidHarington - 5/28/2014 11:28:23 PM
ckurz7000 - 6/5/2014 8:40:31 PM
Tim Dawson - 6/9/2014 10:58:49 AM
ckurz7000 - 6/11/2014 3:47:04 PM
ckurz7000 - 7/16/2014 9:21:01 AM
Tim Dawson - 7/17/2014 4:08:59 PM
Bouwair - 7/20/2014 3:37:28 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/21/2014 12:09:58 PM
ckurz7000 - 7/21/2014 12:41:35 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/21/2014 2:58:59 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/22/2014 12:27:32 PM
ckurz7000 - 7/22/2014 1:41:57 PM
guille - 7/22/2014 1:56:37 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/22/2014 4:31:40 PM
srayne - 7/23/2014 7:36:14 AM
Tim Dawson - 7/23/2014 10:39:22 AM
srayne - 7/23/2014 10:46:18 AM
mjk - 7/29/2014 3:54:13 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/23/2014 11:30:23 AM
srayne - 7/23/2014 12:03:43 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/23/2014 2:31:16 PM
srayne - 7/23/2014 4:41:53 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/24/2014 8:15:59 AM
Awful Charlie - 7/28/2014 7:33:38 AM
Tim Dawson - 7/30/2014 11:37:26 AM
srayne - 7/30/2014 11:48:57 AM
mjk - 7/30/2014 12:31:02 PM
mjk - 7/30/2014 12:22:05 PM
mjk - 7/30/2014 1:09:14 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/30/2014 6:05:36 PM
mjk - 7/31/2014 6:54:16 AM
srayne - 7/31/2014 7:27:44 AM
mjk - 7/31/2014 7:35:37 AM
                         [quote][b]mjk (7/31/2014)[/b][hr]not differentiated enough[/quote] I...
srayne - 7/31/2014 7:40:40 AM
                             Personally, I would follow the defacto standard set by Garmin. There,...
ckurz7000 - 7/31/2014 12:32:55 PM
Tim Dawson - 7/31/2014 8:17:07 AM
srayne - 7/31/2014 8:37:23 AM
Tim Dawson - 7/31/2014 2:49:25 PM
Tim Dawson - 8/1/2014 11:06:18 AM
Bouwair - 5/5/2015 8:37:04 AM
Tim Dawson - 5/5/2015 10:07:33 AM

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search