Group: Forum Members
Posts: 51,
Visits: 358
|
After looking at the two options you presented for view 2, I definitely think your latter proposal (with wind speed without H/T and L/R) is the best one. Duplicated information (H/T and L/R on top of wind arrows) just makes the picture more cluttered. For view 1 the wind vector values are shown as degrees/speed like 219/49, not something like D219/S49. I don't think anybody would like a D219/S49 format. So no H/T L/R prefix makes the two views consistent.
Another interesting observation: for all the other instruments the upper half of the instrument tells the function (GS, DST NXT, ALT etc) and the lower half displays the value. However, on the wind instrument it is opposte: view 1 shows the wind vector in the lower half and the value (direction/speed) in the upper half. And your proposal for view 2 displays the wind arrows in the lower half and the values in the upper half. May be you should swap the upper and lower half such that the function (wind vector in view 1 and wind arrows in view 2) is shown in the upper half, and the values are shown in the lower half?
|