|
Tom1969
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 23,
Visits: 9
|
Hello, i found that for eddv edve then CTR (HX) is Not displayed in then charts!  
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 8.9K
|
The depiction in SkyDemon is in accordance with the AIP. Are you saying you'd like to see the little edge part split off and marked differently, as in the chart you posted?
|
|
|
|
|
pilot-byom
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 323,
Visits: 388
|
+xThe depiction in SkyDemon is in accordance with the AIP. Are you saying you'd like to see the little edge part split off and marked differently, as in the chart you posted? The depiction of SkyDemon seems to be incomplete, i.e. the CTR of EDDV is split into 2 sectors, with the part left to the greatest N-S distance (MIL Wunstorf related) airspace D part = EDDV-SectorB being HX - and btw, the complex C(HX) structure around EDDK appears to be missing in SkyDemon as well. Even more, glider airspaces seem missing as well, i.e. I am unable to find WANLO, GUSTORF(1&2), BAD NEUENAHR, DIERDORF, GAMOLA, BIRKEN etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 8.9K
|
I do not believe we are missing any controlled airspace in SkyDemon. Can you elaborate?
There are airspaces only relevant to glider activities which are not shown on the standard DFS day paper chart, which we also do not show in SkyDemon. Are those the glider sectors to which you refer?
|
|
|
|
|
grahamb
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 565,
Visits: 27K
|
+xThe depiction in SkyDemon is in accordance with the AIP. Are you saying you'd like to see the little edge part split off and marked differently, as in the chart you posted? ENR 2.1 notifies that the western sector is only active during midnight local Sunday to midnight local Friday, bank holidays excepted.
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Dawson
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 8.9K
|
Yes indeed, I have read the AIP too. The question is, what we do about that in SkyDemon (if anything). The CTR isn't actually divided, but that line is arguably helpful, assuming we can annotate the airspace in a similar way.
|
|
|
|
|
emporer
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 69,
Visits: 5
|
Sincs the CTR is devided in two sections, one being a HX-CTR, SD should also reflect this separation.
Furthermore some additional information is missing:
VRP : S1, S2,V1,V2
Bird sanctuary area over the lake
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
Tom1969
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 23,
Visits: 9
|
+xYes indeed, I have read the AIP too. The question is, what we do about that in SkyDemon (if anything). The CTR isn't actually divided, but that line is arguably helpful, assuming we can annotate the airspace in a similar way. On weekend it is helpful to have this information because you can get the information from Hannover tower if this area is activated !
|
|
|
|
|
grahamb
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 565,
Visits: 27K
|
+xYes indeed, I have read the AIP too. The question is, what we do about that in SkyDemon (if anything). The CTR isn't actually divided, but that line is arguably helpful, assuming we can annotate the airspace in a similar way. Remove it from the weekend view?
|
|
|
|
|
Tom1969
|
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 23,
Visits: 9
|
+x+xYes indeed, I have read the AIP too. The question is, what we do about that in SkyDemon (if anything). The CTR isn't actually divided, but that line is arguably helpful, assuming we can annotate the airspace in a similar way. Remove it from the weekend view? I think it is more helpful that you have the information the it is an CTR (HX) ... the same is in brunswick EDVE
|
|
|
|