Important: These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our Customer Support.

SE2 and SD traffic warnings


Author
Message
Tony N
Tony N
Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)Too Much Forum (19K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 343, Visits: 2.5K
The last time I flew with SE2 I went to a fairly busy airfield so was keeping a good visual lookout in the circuit and listening to SD audio traffic warnings.
I think it may be helpful if the order of the audio traffic warning information was in a different order.
At the moment the altitude of the "target" aircraft is announced last along with info if climbing, descending or level.
I had to listen to all the other info first before being able to decide if it is a likely threat or not.
If the warning info was re-ordered then SD users wouldn't have to listen to the whole warning before deciding if avoiding action was necessary.
Suggest the order is something like this:
Altitude (climbing/descending/level), position, crossing direction etc.

Tony

Replies
Peter Robertson
Peter Robertson
Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)Too Much Forum (1.7K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 48, Visits: 140
Tony,

I have significant experience over more than 40 years of the use of communications in a variety of fields - including military and civilian emergency services and ham radio, as well as in aviation, and strongly agree with Paul on this one.

The use of standard message formats and terminology is of vital importance in critical (or emergency) communications - especially in potentially stressful, busy, high noise or poor radio quality environments, as it helps the brain to subconsciously recognise, register, decode, interpret and act on the message, without distracting focus away from the job in hand - in our case flying the aircraft and continuing to maintain effective visual scan. For this reason it is essential that we keep the format and content of audio warnings as close as possible to the standard (ATC style) format.

Significant deviation or variation will only lead to confusion with potentially critical consequences.

Best Regards

Peter


Edited 11/14/2020 8:55:09 AM by Peter Robertson
grahamb
grahamb
Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)Too Much Forum (8.1K reputation)
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 576, Visits: 27K
/thread and product drift/
For that very reason, PilotAware should colour code METAR consistently with the system used at military airfields. :-)

GO

Merge Selected

Merge into selected topic...



Merge into merge target...



Merge into a specific topic ID...




Threaded View
Threaded View
tnowak - 11/9/2020 8:13:28 AM
Tim Dawson - 11/9/2020 9:22:11 AM
tnowak - 11/10/2020 6:55:50 AM
Tim Dawson - 11/11/2020 10:12:38 AM
PaulSS - 11/11/2020 1:09:09 PM
tnowak - 11/12/2020 8:13:50 AM
PaulSS - 11/12/2020 11:44:32 PM
Exfirepro - 11/14/2020 8:42:57 AM
grahamb - 11/14/2020 11:10:19 AM
tnowak - 11/15/2020 8:28:03 AM
Exfirepro - 11/17/2020 10:02:43 AM
tnowak - 11/20/2020 11:51:55 AM
PaulSS - 11/16/2020 10:35:31 AM

Reading This Topic

Login

Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search