Login
Register
Login
Register
Back to SkyDemon Website
Important:
These forums are for discussions between SkyDemon users. They are not routinely monitored by SkyDemon staff so any urgent issues should be sent directly to our
Customer Support
.
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
Suggestions and Beta Discussion
»
Traffic integration via Flightradar24 data?
Traffic integration via Flightradar24 data?
Post Reply
Like
3
Traffic integration via Flightradar24 data?
View
Flat Ascending
Flat Descending
Threaded
Options
Subscribe to topic
Print This Topic
RSS Feed
Goto Topics Forum
Author
Message
Johannes B.
J
Johannes B.
posted 10/28/2019 10:16:00 PM
ANSWER
Topic Details
Share Topic
J
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 48,
Visits: 1
Hello,
would it be feasible to integrate basic traffic information (without the use of 3rd party devices), by displaying live traffic from flightradar24 on the Skydemon map while navigating? This would enable every user with a mobile network connection to at least see ADS-B and MLAT traffic. I imagine this would involve some negotiation with Flightradar24, but I suppose many users would be very interested in such a function?
YouTube channel
Reply
Like
3
Sky Painter
Sky Painter
posted 10/29/2019 10:43:00 AM
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 626,
Visits: 15K
I think FR24 data is not sufficiently reliable. I've seen instances of C150's with an indicated ground speed of 450kts and one instance of a Eurofox at an indicated altitude of 18,000ft. There are also blind spots in their coverage. Mode S equipped aircraft I know to be in the air often do not show up in certain locations. Also, displayed aircraft often disappear and then re-appear sometime later in a different location. It's not the sort of traffic data that I would want to rely on.
Mike
_________________________________________
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 – Android 11.0 & SD
4.0.2.0
Huawei P30 – Android 11.0 & SD 4.0.2.0
PC – Windows 10 (Home Ed) Version 22H2, Build 19045.
5737, SD 4.0.2.0
Reply
Like
4
Johannes B.
J
Johannes B.
posted 10/29/2019 7:56:06 PM
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
J
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 48,
Visits: 1
It seems more reliable than some FLARM systems I know, and even though a certain percentage of traffic might be displayed with false information or position, it is definitely better than nothing in my opinion. I am aware, that this will neither replace looking out for traffic nor be a real alternative to system like a TRX1500 with ADS-B in/ out or TCAS.
YouTube channel
Reply
Like
4
pilot-byom
p
pilot-byom
posted 10/30/2019 10:36:09 AM
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
p
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 323,
Visits: 388
This has been discussed in different shades of grey already.
1. quality of FR24 data is not sufficient
2. quite some aircraft opt'ed-out and suppress broadcast
3. mobile net is often not sufficient
4. dual data streams over wifi and mobile are device dependent
5. legal status of FR24 in different countries is complicated
6. GDPDR is an issue for re-broadcasting legally rather difficult data
7. no real need for the function, simply use a browser
much effort, little benefit
Edited
10/30/2019 10:38:32 AM by
MarkusM
Reply
Like
4
emporer
e
emporer
posted 10/30/2019 10:52:20 PM
ANSWER
Post Details
Share Post
e
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 69,
Visits: 5
I totally agree!!
FR24 allures you in a dangerous and inaccurate safety cushion!
Reply
Like
3
GO
Merge Selected
Merge into selected topic...
Merge into merge target...
Merge into a specific topic ID...
Open Merge
Post Reply
Like
3
Post Quoted Reply
Reading This Topic
Login
Login
Remember Me
Reset Password
Resend Validation Email
Login
Explore
Messages
Mentions
Search